Posts Tagged ‘“wrongful death”’
Massachusetts Workers Rally for Safety and to Commemorate Fallen Workers
Massachusetts workplace accidents and the lives they claim were the focus today at the Workers’ Memorial Day Commemoration and Rally at the Massachusetts State House. The event honored the 62 workers killed on the job in Massachusetts last year. Organizers called for workplace safety improvements to prevent more injuries and deaths.
The names of the victims of workplace accidents were read aloud at the beginning of the rally, and a moment of silence honored the men and women, as well as their families.
In a report on Massachusetts workplace accidents released today, the Massachusetts Coalition for the Occupational Safety and Health (MassCOSH) said for every worker killed on the job, 10 more die from occupational disease. Massachusetts workplace accidents resulting in death in 2009 included:
- 6 servicemen and women who died as a result of the war in Iraq
- 9 construction accident deaths
- 7 fishing accident deaths
- 11 deaths among Massachusetts firefighters
- 11 transportation accident deaths
- 6 workplace violence deaths
MassCOSH, which co-sponsored today’s rally with the Massachusetts AFL-CIO and the Greater Boston Labor Council, estimated 1,800 Massachusetts workers were diagnosed with cancers caused by workplace exposures last year. Another 50,000 Massachusetts workers reported serious personal injuries.
There are currently several efforts to prevent Massachusetts workplace accidents. Last Workers’ Memorial Day, Governor Deval Patrick issued an executive order establishing health and safety committees in all state agencies. But MassCOSH said a glaring problem that still must be changed is that Massachusetts’ public sector employees are not covered under the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) like private sector workers.
Among other recommendations, MassCOSH calls on the state to be more proactive and to protect temporary workers by passing the Employment Agency Bill (Senate Bill 2364). This bill will require employment agencies to provide written notice about key details of job assignments, the work site employer, the type of work to be done, the right to workers’ compensation and other important information. We believe this bill is especially important in light of this economic time.
MassCOSH’s complete report is titled, “Dying for Work in Massachusetts: Loss of Life and Limb in Masachusetts Workplaces.” It is available from MassCOSH.
Boston attorney David White (below) attended the rally on behalf of the firm.
Breakstone, White & Gluck, a Massachusetts workplace accident law firm, supports MassCOSH and its work to improve Massachusetts workplace safety, inspections and enforcement.
Defective Product Leads to Proposed Plea Deal in the Largest Criminal Penalty Ever Assessed Against a Medical Device Company
Guidant LLC, a division of Massachusetts’ company Boston Scientific, has plead guilty to two misdemeanor counts alleging the medical device maker failed to disclose product changes involving over 20,000 implantable heart monitor devices.
The medical device manufacturer plead guilty Monday, April 5 and will learn over the next few weeks whether U.S. District Judge Donovan Frank will accept a proposed $296 million plea deal – the largest criminal assessment ever proposed against a medical device company.
The Department of Justice accuses Guidant of changing the design of its implantable cardioverter defribrillators, or ICDs, and failing to notify the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of subsequent problems that lead to a Class 1 medical recall – the most serious category which indicate a defective product has the potential to cause serious personal injury or wrongful death.
Guidant’s implantable cardioverter defribrillators, Ventak Prizm 2 DR and Contak Renewal 1 and 2, were designed to monitor patients for abnormal heart rhythms and deliver electric shocks to keep the heart beating properly. But Department of Justice officials say Guidant discovered as early as 2002 that Ventak had the potential to suffer an electric arc, which could short-circuit the device. Although problems continued with the defribrillator, Guidant didn’t issue a warning until 2005. In at least seven cases, the devices failed to issue a lifesaving shock and the patient died.
In 2005, Guidant sent a product update to doctors, advising that a yellow warning screen indicated a potentially serious problem. However, the FDA says the company should have sent a product correction, rather than a product update, since the change reduced the risk of serious injury, and should have notified the FDA of the change within 10 days. Guidant ultimately recalled its three devices in 2005.
Attorneys for the affected patients are now urging the court to reject the plea deal because it will not provide restitution payments to victims. The government prosecutor has argued that the victims have other remedies for compensation and that the applicable law does not require restitution. The prosecutor points to the fact that most of the victims have settled civil suits with the company and the company has paid out over $650 million in settlement and warranty payments. Additionally, $42 million of the plea amount is forfeited funds and victims can petition the Justice Department for their share.
For more information on the plea deal, see this Boston Globe article and this Star Tribune article.
Tired Truckers and Truck Accidents May Be Reduced with New Regulations—Massachusetts Highways Should Be Safer
A lawsuit over tired truck driving may eliminate an embattled rule that concerns safety advocates about the risk of truck accidents, motor vehicle accidents and wrongful deaths on the nation’s roadways.
Since 2004, advocacy groups have been battling an hours-of-service rule passed by the Bush administration that increased the maximum number of consecutive hours a trucker could work from ten to eleven and decreased the rest and recovery time from fifty hours to thirty-four. Safety advocates claim that the changes are likely to lead to more motor vehicle accidents, serious personal injuries and wrongful deaths.
Twice, advocacy groups have successfully challenged the rule in court just to have the administration reissue the same rule. In 2004, the court vacated the hours-of-service rule on the grounds that the government did not adequately consider the effects of longer driving hours on individual truck driver welfare and public safety. In 2007, the court vacated the rule again because the agency did not allow public notice and comment on the new crash risk analysis used as justification to reissue the same rule.
Advocacy groups brought a third lawsuit in 2009 and will finally see an outcome. As part of a legal settlement, the Department of Transportation and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) have agreed to redraft the existing hours-of-service rule. In January, the agencies held several sessions around the country to gather public comment.
As they start work, safety advocates hope that the new rule will reflect the dangerous reality of tired truckers. The deaths and personal injuries caused by drivers falling asleep in the cab can be catastrophic for truck drivers and people on the road.
The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board points to driver fatigue as a likely factor in twenty to forty percent of truck crashes. Safety advocates, including members of Parents Against Tired Truckers and Citizens for Reliable and Safe Highways, applaud the settlement as a step in the right direction towards safe roads.
There are typically over 1,000 Massachusetts truck accidents every year, nearly half of which involve out-of-state motor carriers. In 2006, 34 people were killed in Massachusetts trucking accidents.
For more information on the regulations, see the FMCSA website. The Truck Safety Coalition has a collection of stories and press releases on the hours-of-service rule and trucker fatigue.
Contact Breakstone, White & Gluck now
If you need assistance with a case involving a wrongful death or personal injury as the result of a truck accident, please contact the Boston law firm of Breakstone, White and Gluck. We have a long record of proven results. An experienced attorney is available for a free consultation by calling 800-379-1244 or contacting us online.
After Three Infant Deaths, Company Recalls Baby Sling– Massachusetts Residents Should Take Warning
The US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), in cooperation with Infantino LLC of San Diego, have announced a free replacement program for two models of defective infant slings. One million of the defective products are being recalled after the three wrongful deaths of infants due to incidents of suffocation. CPSC is aware of the deaths of a seven week old in Philadelphia, a six day old in Salem, OR, and a three month old and Cincinatti, OH. CPSC advises consumers to immediately stop using these slings for infants younger than four months of age due to a risk of suffocation and contact Infantino for a free replacement product. 
The affected sling models are the “SlingRider” and the “Wendy Bellissimo.” Infantino LLC sold the slings in the United States from January 2003 through March 2010 at Walmart, Burlington Coat Factory, Target, Babies “R” Us, BJ’s Wholesale, various baby and children’s stores and other retailers nationwide, and on Amazon.com, for between $25 and $30. The slings were manufactured in China and Thailand. Consumers should contact Infantino to receive a free replacement product.
CPCS has also released a general warning about sling carriers for babies as they pose two risks of suffocation. The sling’s fabric can press against an infant’s nose and mouth, blocking the baby’s breathing. Additionally, where a sling keeps the infant in a curled position bending the chin toward the chest, the airways can be restricted. CPCS is working with concerned companies to develop safety standards for baby slings.
For information on obtaining a free replacement product, visit www.infantino.com.
To report an incident involving a recalled product, file an incident report at https://www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/incident.aspx.
For more information on the CPCS warning, see the CPCS website. For more information on this specific recall, see this press release. Read More
Ex-NYC Chief Crane Inspector Put Lives in Danger by Accepting Bribes
James Delayo, the former chief crane inspector for New York City, has plead guilty to accepting more than $10,000 in bribes to fake inspections and crane operator licensing test results. Delayo has admitted to accepting bribes between 2002 and 2008 to file paperwork indicating that a Long Island-based crane company had passed inspections that never happened and to say an employee passed a licensing exam never taken. For these and other favors, Delayo received from $200 to $3000 in individual payoffs. An official and employee with the involved Long Island crane company, Nu-Way Crane Service, have plead not guilty to bribery and record tampering. Delayo is currently out on bail until his sentencing on May 4th. His plea deal calls for two to six years in prison.
Delayo was arrested back in 2008 after the second of two serious construction accidents caused by massive cranes collapsing. The accidents caused the wrongful deaths of nine people. Authorities said at the time that Delayo’s case was one in a series of cases against builders and inspectors accused of accepting tainted money. Consistent with that claim, Delayo is not the only person in trouble after the 2008 crane collapses. A crane rigging contractor has been charged with manslaughter for one collapse and a crane owner and former mechanic have been charged with manslaughter for the other collapse. Since the 2008 accidents, New York City building officials have made changes to crane training requirements and exam procedures for some operators. Additionally, some inspections are now performed by a national group.
To see additional coverage of this story, see this Boston Globe article.
Big Dig Handrails Under Scrutiny After Massachusetts Drivers’ Deaths
Lawmakers and individuals are calling for change after seven deadly Big Dig crashes have been linked to handrails in the tunnels. State Senate President Therese Murphy has requested that the Department of Transportation, which overseas the tunnel system, review the handrails’ design and safety. Between 2004 and 2008, seven of the nine fatal accidents in the Big Dig were the result of vehicles hitting the handrails. Most crash victims were dismembered. The handrails line about six miles of the Big Dig on elevated walkways and are designed to prevent workers from tumbling into traffic.
The handrails are also the subject of litigation in Suffolk Superior Court. The widow of State Trooper Vincent Cila, who was killed after hitting a handrail post while on a motorcycle in 2005, has filed a wrongful death suit against multiple parties, including the state Turnpike Authority. The defendants assert that the handrails meet all applicable safety standards and regulations.
Despite assertions to the handrails’ safety, relatives and friends of crash victims are calling for the handrail design to be changed. Experts consulted by the Boston Globe said that the handrails are flawed. The horizontal rails are spaced far apart, allowing motorists to become entangled, and the rails are only three feet above the road, at head level. However, handrail design may not be solely to blame for the grisly crashes. Many of the drivers killed were speeding or not wearing seatbelts.
For assistance with a motor vehicle accident, truck accident, or wrongful death case, please contact the attorneys at the Boston law firm of Breakstone, White and Gluck. The lawyers have over 80 years of experience with litigating in state and federal court, at the trial and appellate level. To consult with an experienced attorney, call 800 379 1244 or visit the firm’s website.
AstraZeneca Facing Over 25,000 Lawsuits–Antipsychotic Drug Claimed to Cause Diabetes
AstraZeneca is preparing for a products liability trial next week over claims that their antipsychotic medication Seroquel causes diabetes. About 26,000 lawsuits have been filed against the drugmaker, with one of many trials set for February 16th in New Jersey. That trial will be the first of thousands filed in New Jersey alone. Seroquel is the UK-based drugmaker’s second most popular drug after Nexium, the well known heartburn relief medication, and is used to treat bipolar disorder and depression. AstraZeneca claims that the plaintiffs’ evidence is insufficient to show that the drug was responsible for their alleged personal injuries.
In January, U.S. District Judge Anne Conway, who is overseeing all federal Seroquel litigation, ordered the parties to attend mediation. The parties were unable to reach a settlement agreement after two days of talks. The mediator, George Washington University Law Professor Stephen Saltzberg, said he expects further settlement negotiations to occur. Judge Conway, who sits in Florida, has said that she will ask a panel of judges to return the 6,000 consolidated cases scheduled to come before her to their resident states, adding to the litigation headache.
Seroquel was introduced in 1997 and has long been linked to weight gain and diabetes. The plaintiffs are claiming that AstraZeneca downplayed the risk of diabetes, cherry-picked positive trial results, and buried negative results. Documents discovered in 2009 appear to substantiate the plaintiffs’ claims. As early as 1997, emails between AstraZeneca officials reveal that the drugmaker hid negative trial results from US and Canadian investigators. AstraZeneca is not the first antipsychotic drugmaker to be hit with claims that its medication causes diabetes. In 2009, Zyprexra-maker Eli Lilly agreed to pay at least $1.2 billion to similar settle lawsuits filed by about 31,000 patients.
For more information on Seroquel side effects, see the Seroquel website. The Alliance for Human Research Protection has a collection of articles on the Seroquel product liability litigation.
Read More
Toyota’s Headaches Continue–Massachusetts Prius Owners Should Be Aware of Defective Brakes
Toyota faced another round of bad news this week with the announcement today of a probe by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) into braking problems in the popular Prius hybrid model. NHTSA has received at least 124 complaints about momentary braking problems in the defective vehicles. As least four car crashes have been reported. The problems are apparently associated with speed bumps, potholes, and icy roads–three things Massachusetts drivers see plenty of. The investigation concerns the 2010 Prius model year.
The Prius investigation is the third in a string of product defect recalls which are tarnishing Toyota’s reputation for safety and reliability. On top of that, it seems that Toyota has been less than forthright about the problems in its cars. According to CNN (February 4, 1010), “Toyota has known about brake problems in its popular Prius cars for some time, going so far as to fix it in new production vehicles, but has kept Prius drivers in the dark about the problem until the Japanese government called for an investigation.” And the sticking gas pedal was first blamed on floor mats, and then later extended to the mechanics of the pedal itself. The Federal government has now demanded that Toyota demonstrate that the problem isn’t more serious, and that it does not include other parts of the throttle control systems. Defects relating to the gas pedals have been linked to several wrongful deaths.
U.S. Transportation Secretary Roy LaHood set off a brief panic on February 3rd when he said owners of the defective Toyotas should “stop driving them.” He later clarified his statement, saying instead that owners should have them repaired as quickly as possible.
NHTSA itself has been criticized for its slow response to consumer complaints about Toyota acceleration problems, some of which date back to 2003. According to Joan Claybrook, a former head of NHTSA, several investigations were opened, then closed based upon information provided by Toyota. According to NPR, she said, “I think as a result, some people have been killed and injured that wouldn’t have otherwise.” (NPR, Feb 4, 2010.)
Consumer Alert
This week Toyota finally began shipping replacement parts to dealers for the gas pedal recall. Checks with some dealers in Massachusetts revealed that free rental vehicles are available. If the dealer does not have the part, it should still provide you with a free car should you choose to leave it at the dealer for repair. Many Massachusetts consumers are rightfully fearful that their car could be involved in a motor vehicle accident.
The same courtesy should apply to the defective Prius models, and consumers should feel free to demand that the dealer provide them with a safe, alternative vehicle until their cars are fixed.
Affected Vehicles
Models affected by the recall include:
- 2009-2010 RAV4
- 2009-2010 Corolla
- 2007-2010 Camry
- 2009-2010 Matrix
- 2005-2010 Avalon
- 2010 Highlander
- 2007-2010 Tundra
- 2008-2010 Sequoia
Please see our earlier blog on Toyota recalls for additional safety information.
More Information
Much additional information on the Toyota recall is available from the NHTSA website, www.nhtsa.gov.
Answers to Questions About Toyota Repair Plans, NY Times, Feb 1, 2010
US Launches Probe of Prius Brakes, Reuters, Feb 4, 2010
Read More
Huge Toyota Recall Affects Thousands of Massachusetts Drivers–Defective Gas Pedals May Cause Runaway Acceleration
Toyota has issued another recall affecting millions of its popular vehicles due to acceleration problems caused by sticking gas pedals which are known to have caused serious personal injury and several deaths. In addition, Toyota has halted sales and will halt production of several product lines until it designs a fix for the product defect. This recall seriously affects Toyota’s reputation for safety and reliability. It also affects tens of thousands of Massachusetts drivers who own the defective Toyotas. It also affects others on the highway who may be struck by a runaway vehicle.
Toyota announced the voluntary recall last Thursday, which includes about 2.3 million vehicles, “to correct sticking accelerator pedals on specific Toyota Division models.” The sticking pedals may fail to return, or return slowly, to the idle position, causing the cars to accelerate or maintain a high speed unexpectedly.
The recall comes after a recall on floor mats in September 2009 affecting 3.8 million vehicles. That recall was found to be insufficient to solve the accelerator problems. Investigators realized the product defect included more than just the floor mats after a family of four suffered wrongful deaths when their Avalon crashed into a lake. The floor mats were discovered in the trunk of that car.
In November 2009, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) called the removal of the offending floor mats an interim measure only, and said, “This remedy does not correct the underlying defect in the vehicles involving the potential for entrapment of the accelerator by floor mats, which is related to accelerator and floor pan design.”
Unfortunately, Toyota has not yet proposed a plan to fix its millions of defective vehicles.
Massachusetts consumers who experience gas pedal problems are advised to apply firm pressure to the brake, and to pull off the road as soon as that can be done safely. The car should not be driven. In an emergency, the car can be put into neutral or the key turned to off. Push-button start controls can be turned off if the button is depressed for several seconds.
Models affected by the recall include:
- 2009-2010 RAV4
- 2009-2010 Corolla
- 2007-2010 Camry
- 2009-2010 Matrix
- 2005-2010 Avalon
- 2010 Highlander
- 2007-2010 Tundra
- 2008-2010 Sequoia.
Toyota customers affected by this recall should call the Toyota “Customer Experience Center” at 1-800-331-4331 with questions or concerns.
In-car Electronics Create Distractions and Impair Driving
One of the leading causes of motor vehicle accidents for Massachusetts drivers may be the device in the driver’s pocket. A recent Harvard University study concluded that 2,600 wrongful deaths and 570,000 personal injuries are caused each year by cell phone distractions. According to a Virginia Tech study, drivers using cell phones are more impaired than a legally drunk driver. Despite the known dangers of in-car electronics, car makers are taking driver distractions one step further with in-car “infotainment” systems.
As recently unveiled at the 2010 Consumer Electronics Show, car makers and internet companies are teaming up to equip cars with interactive screens on the dashboard that display maps, videos, and internet sites. Safety advocates are concerned about the risk of car accidents and pedestrian accidents caused by distracted drivers watching the screen instead of the road. A recent New York Times article on these new systems discusses how the danger of crashing dramatically increases when a motorist looks at a screen, even a GPS screen.
Car makers assure that safety mechanisms will be in place to minimize the risk of driver distractions, such as voice controls or blocking internet use when the car is in motion. However, some safety advocates are questioning whether car manufacturers are placing profit concerns above safety. It only takes two seconds for the likelihood of a crash to increase exponentially.