Recently in Motor Vehicle Accidents Category

July 6, 2010

Toyota Recalls Lexus Models: What to Do if You're a Lexus Owner

Toyota recalled 270,000 Lexus and Crown vehicles sold around the world this week due to possible contamination during valve spring manufacturing. The company has now recalled more than 8.5 million vehicles for sticking gas pedals, anti-lock brake software glitches and a host of other safety problems.

Massachusetts Lexus owners impacted by the motor vehicle recall will receive official notice from Toyota by first-class mail. Owners will be asked to contact their local Lexus dealer to have the engine's valve spring replaced at no charge.

Toyota said a foreign substance involved in manufacturing may have contaminated a small number of the valves. If a vehicle is defective, drivers may notice idling or abnormal engine noise. The engine could also stop while the vehicle is in operation.

Of the 270,000 recalled vehicles, 138,000 were sold in the United States, 91,903 in Japan, 15,000 in Europe, 10,000 in the Middle East, 6,000 in China and 4,000 in Canada.

The vehicles were sold between July 2005 and August 2008. They include Lexus models GS350, GS450h, GS460, IS350, LS460, LS600h, LS600hl and Crown models.

This Lexus recall comes just days after Toyota recalled another Lexus model - the Lexus HS250h - because it spilled too much gasoline during crash tests. The tests were part of yearly safety reviews by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

In May, Toyota paid a record $16.4 million fine in the United States for responding too slowly when motor vehicle safety problems emerged. The fine was the largest civil penalty ever assessed against an auto maker by the NHTSA.

The NHTSA has linked 89 motor vehicle deaths and 57 injuries over the last decade to Toyota accelerator problems. Overall, it has received more than 6,200 complaints involving unintended acceleration in Toyota's cars.

Toyota faces more than 200 lawsuits in the United States. The cases involve defective automobiles, lower resale value of Toyota vehicles and stock price declines. The lawsuits, including 130 class-action lawsuits, are being heard in Southern California, near Toyota's Torrance headquarters.

Continue reading "Toyota Recalls Lexus Models: What to Do if You're a Lexus Owner" »

Bookmark and Share
June 29, 2010

Massachusetts Bars Must Now Carry Liquor Liability Insurance

It's always a tragedy when someone leaves a bar after a night of drinking, steps in his or her car, and causes a motor vehicle accident resulting in personal injury.

For years, that tragedy was compounded by Massachusetts law, which let bars and restaurants operate without liquor liability insurance. Like other businesses, Massachusetts restaurants and bars have traditionally carried general commercial liability insurance covering on-site problems, including slip and falls and other injuries. But this insurance offers no assistance to drunk driving accident victims.

In late May, Massachusetts lawmakers corrected this and passed a law requiring restaurant and bar owners to carry liquor liability insurance. Establishments must carry a minimum of $250,000 per person/$500,000 per accident coverage. In other words, policies must provide a minimum $250,000 for bodily injury or death of one person and a total of $500,000 per incident involving bodily injury or death.

Innocent victims of drunk driving accidents still face the traditional hurdles in proving their cases against bars. One hurdle is strong juror bias. Juries do not hesitate to hold the drunk driver responsible. But juries are often reluctant to blame a drinking establishment for over-serving a patron, even though the law is perfectly clear that a bar has a legal duty to not serve someone who is intoxicated.

Restaurants and bars seek to avoid liability for over-serving patrons, and they typically claim they did not recognize that the patron was intoxicated. The recent Massachusetts Appeals Court case of Rivera v. Club Caravan, Inc., 77 Mass. App. Ct. 17 (2010), reviewed the legal standards for "dram shop cases." Generally the plaintiff must prove the patron showed outward signs of intoxication by the time he or she was served her last drink. However, circumstantial proof can also be sufficient. If the patron had consumed excessive quantities of alcohol, a jury can draw an inference that he would have been visibly intoxicated. So, where a patron is served fourteen drinks in two hours, as in the Rivera case, or was served six or more white Russians, as in another Massachusetts case, the circustantial evidence is strong enough.  

Personal injury attorney Ronald Gluck called the new law "a step forward" for the safety of Massachusetts residents.  "Restaurants and bars will want to have strong policies in place--and to follow them--not just to avoid liability but also to avoid large increases in their insurance premiums. The new liquor insurance law should help reduce drunk driving accidents in Massachusetts."

Click here for the full text of the law.

Continue reading "Massachusetts Bars Must Now Carry Liquor Liability Insurance" »

Bookmark and Share
June 22, 2010

Massachusetts Law Will Ban Text Messaging While Driving

Welcome news today as the Massachusetts Legislature has finally agreed on a new law that will make it illegal to text while driving. Once the bill is signed by the Governor, Massachusetts will be in line with twenty-eight other states that have already outlawed text messaging while driving.

This law comes in the wake of several tragic text message-based accidents. In May 2009, 62 people suffered personal injury after a Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority trolley collided with another trolley because the driver was texting his girlfriend. In September 2008, a California commuter train engineer missed a stop signal while trading texts with a friend, leading to a train accident resulting in the wrongful death of 25 people. In addition, there have been several high profile motor vehicle wrongful death cases in recent memory which were caused by inattentive drivers who were texting as they drove.

The law has several other public safety improvements. The new law will require that older drivers renew their licenses in person and take an eye exam every five years beginning at age 75. Older drivers were involved in several serious car accidents in 2009 in Massachusetts. Further, the law will forbid anyone under the age of 18 from using a cell phone while driving.

Boston personal injury attorney David White said of the new law, "Distracted driving is a serious safety problem. The use of cell phones and text messaging are two of the biggest distractions for drivers. These new provisions will vastly increase the safety of Massachusetts roadways."

A recent study found that texting while driving makes a person twenty times more likely to get into a car crash or near-crash. The problem is most severe for inexperienced drivers. It is hoped that this new law will raise awareness to this growing epidemic of serious personal injuries caused by careless texting motorists.

 For more information

Boston Globe

Virgina Tech Transportation Institute Research Project

Continue reading "Massachusetts Law Will Ban Text Messaging While Driving" »

Bookmark and Share
May 31, 2010

Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month Time for All Road Users to Think Safety

As Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month draws to a close, we ask both motorcyclists and automobile drivers to take a moment to think safety this summer.

Motorcycling continues to grow in popularity in Massachusetts and around the country, and so do fatal crashes between cars and motorcycles.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reports in 2008, motorcyclist fatalities increased for the 11th consecutive year. Some 5,290 motorcyclists lost their lives in fatal highway crashes. Almost 50 percent of all motorcyclists involved in fatal crashes collided with other motor vehicles. Over 90 percent of all fatal two-vehicle crashes involving a motorcycle and a passenger vehicle occurred on non-interstate roadways. About half of all fatal crashes between a motorcycle and a passenger vehicle occurred at intersections. Often the driver of the car or truck involved in the accident simply failed to observe the motorcyclist.

Here are some motorcycle safety tips:


  • Wear a helmet. NHTSA statistics show you have a 29 percent better chance of surviving a crash than without a helmet.

  • If you're concerned helmets interfere with your ability to see and hear on the road, read this NHTSA study. It found helmets caused no substantial impact: drivers wearing helmets had to turn their necks only slightly farther at times and there was no significant difference in hearing.

  • Remember to turn off your flash signal if it's not self-canceling.

  • Make sure you're experienced enough to ride with a passenger. It changes the way the bike handles and requires more skill.

  • Take turns slower than you think is necessary.

Here's a few tips for passenger vehicle and truck drivers:


  • Never drive while distracted.

  • Remember a motorcycle has the same rights as any other vehicle on the road.

  • Do not attempt to share a lane with a motorcyclists. Allow the motorcyclist a full lane width to maneuver safely to avoid motorcycle crashes.

  • Remember to use your signals to change lanes or merge with traffic. Motorcyclists depend on those signals even more than other drivers.

  • Check your vehicle's blind spot! Motorcyclists are even easier to miss due to their small size.

  • Don't rely on a motorcycle's flashing turn signal. They may not be self-canceling and riders sometimes forget to turn them off or can't do so immediately due to road conditions. Wait to make sure the motorcyclist is really going to turn to avoid motorcycle collisions.

  • Remember motorcyclists often change speed or adjust position within a lane suddenly in response to road and traffic conditions. Allow the motorcyclist extra room - at least three or four seconds.

Continue reading "Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month Time for All Road Users to Think Safety" »

Bookmark and Share
May 18, 2010

Mass Commuter Challenge and Bay State Bike Week Remind Us to Pay Attention on Roads

Commuters across the state have been pedaling their way to work, the grocery store and other destinations all week as part of Bay State Bike Week and the Mass Commuter Challenge.

Commuters pledged to step out of their cars from May 17-21 and pedal 175,000 miles to workplaces from Worcester to Boston to Plymouth and across the rest of Massachusetts.

The challenge was organized to promote a healthy, non-polluting and sustainable means of transportation. Breakstone, White & Gluck supports this mission but hopes the Mass Commuter Challenge also highlights another important point: that as more bicycles take to the road, drivers and bicyclists must be more aware of each other for safety's sake.

There are far too many bicycle accidents taking place on the roads today. In 2008, 716 bicyclists were killed across the country and an additional 52,000 were injured in traffic crashes, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The NHTSA numbers show that 69 percent of bicycle accidents occured in urban areas and 28 percent of accidents occured between the hours of 5 p.m. and 9 p.m. The majority of the accidents occured in June (9 percent) and September (12 percent).

What Drivers Can Do to Improve Safety
The laws have changed significantly in the last year. Drivers have many more responsibilities to avoid injuring bicyclists. The first step is to be aware that you need to check twice for a cyclist. When overtaking cyclists, you cannot turn right unless there is adequate room, and you must yield to on-coming cyclists when turning left. When passing, you must do so at a safe distance. And remember to pay attention even after you turn off your motor vehicle's engine. Under Massachusetts bike safety laws, motorists and their passengers can be fined up to $100 for opening car and truck doors in the path of a bicyclist.

A final tip: Put down that cell phone and concentrate on the road!

What Bicyclists Can Do to Improve Safety
Bicyclists can remember that bright colored reflective clothing and helmets save lives. Massachusetts only requires individuals age 1 to 16 to wear helmets, but we advise adults to wear them as well to avoid head injuries. Cyclists must obey the same rules as automobiles when on pubic ways. One of the biggest causes of accidents to cyclists: traveling the wrong way on a one-way street.

For more information about events in Boston and the Springfield area, visit www.masscommuterchallenge.org or www.massbike.org.

Continue reading "Mass Commuter Challenge and Bay State Bike Week Remind Us to Pay Attention on Roads" »

Bookmark and Share
May 6, 2010

Aging Motorcyclists Face Greater Risk for Injuries

Baby boomers are taking to the open road on motorcycles at greater rates than ever before and as they do, their personal injuries and fatalities resulting from motorcyle accidents are increasing.

The American Motorcyclist Association reports its average membership age is now 48. The Motorcycle Industry Council trade association, meanwhile, reports the average age of all motorcycle owners increased from 33 to 40 years old between 1998 and 2003. 

motorcycle rider.jpgThe Massachusetts Department of Public Health reports the rate of motorcycle-related deaths and injuries in the state for riders between 55 and 64 quadrupled between 1998 and 2007.  Additionally, although nationally there was a decline in motorcycle related fatalities regardless of age, Massachusetts experienced an increase in fatal motorcycle crashes. 

The state Department of Public Health is not the only one to notice a correlation between age and severity of injury.  Researchers at the University of Rochester Medical Center recently found that motorcyclists over the age of 40 sustained more serious personal injuries, spent more time in the hospital, and were up to twice as likely to die from a motorcycle accident than riders under 40. 

Dr. Mark Gestring, the lead author of the study and director of the trauma center, noticed older riders and more severe injuries in the emergency room.  His research team examined records in the National Trauma Databank and noted several disturbing trends:

  • Riders over 40 were 5% more likely than riders under 40 to require hospitalization in the intensive care unit.
  • Riders over 40 were more likely to suffer complications such as blood clots, pneumonia, or infections. 

The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health found a 145% increase from 2000 to 2006 in death rates for motorcyclists over 65. 

Doctors report that there are several factors accounting for the increased severity and fatality of injuries sustained by older riders.  First, older riders have less resilient skin, bones and blood vessels and cannot handle as much physical trauma as their younger counterparts.  Additionally, older riders come into the hospital with more preexisting heath problems and take more medications that can complicate injuries. 

For more information, read this recent Boston Globe article about aging motorcyclists in Massachusetts.

Continue reading "Aging Motorcyclists Face Greater Risk for Injuries" »

Bookmark and Share
April 27, 2010

Massachusetts Personal Injury Lawyer David White on Money Matters Radio Network

David White, a principal at the Boston personal injury law firm of Breakstone, White & Gluck, recently appeared on Money Matters Radio for their mid-day show. Here is the audio from the presentation.

Money Matters Radio Broadcast

David talks about what car insurance you should have to protect yourself, and others, in the event of a car accident; about medical malpractice; and about insurance bad faith in Massachusetts.

To download the broadcast, click here.

Many thanks to our good friends at Money Matters Radio and host Chris Findlen.

Bookmark and Share
April 16, 2010

Boston Personal Injury Attorneys Urge Residents to Seek Loaner Lexus SUVs As Toyota Conducts Retesting Following Safety Warning

As Toyota suspends sales of the 2010 Lexus GX 460 amid motor vehicle safety questions, concerned drivers can find relief by requesting a loaner sports utility vehicle.

Toyota - already forced recently to recall 2.3 million vehicles over motor vehicle safety defects - halted sales this week after Consumer Reports issued a "Don't Buy: Safety Risk," warning because tests revealed handling problems with the electronic stability control. The magazine is concerned about potential motor vehicle accidents and motor vehicle rollovers. No motor vehicle accidents involving personal injuries or deaths have been reported, but the magazine's "don't buy" warning is its first in nearly a decade for a motor vehicle.

"Drivers are facing an extraordinary number of recalls, mostly from Toyota," said Boston personal injury attorney David W. White of Breakstone, White & Gluck. "Massachusetts residents should immediately seek repairs or loaner vehicles to protect themselves, their families, and other drivers."

Lexus will provide a loaner vehicle for any customer who has bought a 2010 Lexus GX 460 since the vehicle's December release. Customers can call Lexus at 800-255-3987. Lexus has sold about 5,000 vehicles since the Lexus GX 460 was released.

Toyota has suspended sales and production of the Lexus 460 as it tests all its Lexus and Toyota SUVs following the Consumer Reports warning. The carmaker said its engineers previously found no issues with motor vehicle safety, but are now trying to duplicate Consumer Reports' testing to correct the product safety rating.

Toyota recalled 2.3 million vehicles in January for a so-called "sticky pedal defect." The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is now seeking the maximum civil penalty of $16.375 million against Toyota for failing to notify the government agency for at least four months about the product safety defect. Government officials say company officials knew about the potential risk to consumers.

The penalty being sought against Toyota would be the largest civil penalty ever assessed against an auto manufacturer by NHTSA.

For assistance with a product liability case or case involving a wrongful death or personal injury, contact the experienced attorneys at the Boston firm of Breakstone, White and Gluck. The lawyers have over three decades of experience with motor vehicle accident lawsuits and truck accident lawsuits. To consult with a professional and experienced attorney, call 800 379 1244.

Bookmark and Share
April 12, 2010

Tired Truckers and Truck Accidents May Be Reduced with New Regulations---Massachusetts Highways Should Be Safer

A lawsuit over tired truck driving may eliminate an embattled rule that concerns safety advocates about the risk of truck accidents, motor vehicle accidents and wrongful deaths on the nation's roadways.

Since 2004, advocacy groups have been battling an hours-of-service rule passed by the Bush administration that increased the maximum number of consecutive hours a trucker could work from ten to eleven and decreased the rest and recovery time from fifty hours to thirty-four. Safety advocates claim that the changes are likely to lead to more motor vehicle accidents, serious personal injuries and wrongful deaths.

Twice, advocacy groups have successfully challenged the rule in court just to have the administration reissue the same rule.  In 2004, the court vacated the hours-of-service rule on the grounds that the government did not adequately consider the effects of longer driving hours on individual truck driver welfare and public safety.  In 2007, the court vacated the rule again because the agency did not allow public notice and comment on the new crash risk analysis used as justification to reissue the same rule. 

Advocacy groups brought a third lawsuit in 2009 and will finally see an outcome. As part of a legal settlement, the Department of Transportation and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) have agreed to redraft the existing hours-of-service rule. In January, the agencies held several sessions around the country to gather public comment.

As they start work, safety advocates hope that the new rule will reflect the dangerous reality of tired truckers.  The deaths and personal injuries caused by drivers falling asleep in the cab can be catastrophic for truck drivers and people on the road. 

The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board points to driver fatigue as a likely factor in twenty to forty percent of truck crashes.  Safety advocates, including members of Parents Against Tired Truckers and Citizens for Reliable and Safe Highways, applaud the settlement as a step in the right direction towards safe roads.

There are typically over 1,000 Massachusetts truck accidents every year, nearly half of which involve out-of-state motor carriers. In 2006, 34 people were killed in Massachusetts trucking accidents.

For more information on the regulations, see the FMCSA website.  For an overview of what information FMSCA is considering in formulating a new rule, see this presentation. The Truck Safety Coalition has a collection of stories and press releases on the hours-of-service rule and trucker fatigue.     

Continue reading "Tired Truckers and Truck Accidents May Be Reduced with New Regulations---Massachusetts Highways Should Be Safer" »

Bookmark and Share
April 1, 2010

Massachusetts Appeals Court Affirms Broad Evidentiary Rules for Admissibility of Medical Reports


The Massachusetts Appeals Court has affirmed the broad admissibility of certified medical reports under M.G.L. c. 233, ยง 79G. The case, O'Malley v. Soske, Appeals Court No. 09-P-315, (March 31, 2010), is an important reminder of the intent of the legislature when the statute was amended in 1988. In short, in any proceeding commenced in any court, commission or agency, the judge should admit properly certified medical reports.

The plaintiff was injured in a car accident in Boston. She claimed that she suffered neck and back injuries, and required surgery. The defendant contested the nature of the injuries.

The court upheld the admission into evidence of the report of Dr. Lupien, an orthopedic surgeon, who is usually identified as a defense expert, who had examined the plaintiff for the defendant. His opinion was that the accident had not caused serious trauma. The plaintiff lost at trial on the issue of medical causation and her lawyer appealed. The Appeals Court affirmed the judgment.

For a complete analysis of this case, please see the Practice Alert on our website.  

Bookmark and Share
March 22, 2010

Big Dig Handrails Under Scrutiny After Massachusetts Drivers' Deaths

Lawmakers and individuals are calling for change after seven deadly Big Dig crashes have been linked to handrails in the tunnels. State Senate President Therese Murphy has requested that the Department of Transportation, which overseas the tunnel system, review the handrails's design and safety. Between 2004 and 2008, seven of the nine fatal accidents in the Big Dig were the result of vehicles hitting the handrails. Most crash victims were dismembered.  The handrails line about six miles of the Big Dig on elevated walkways and are designed to prevent workers from tumbling into traffic.

The handrails are also the subject of litigation in Suffolk Superior Court.  The widow of State Trooper Vincent Cila, who was killed after hitting a handrail post while on a motorcycle in 2005, has filed a wrongful death suit against multiple parties, including the state Turnpike Authority.  The defendants assert that the handrails meet all applicable safety standards and regulations. 

Despite assertions to the handrails' safety, relatives and friends of crash victims are calling for the handrail design to be changed.  Experts consulted by the Boston Globe said that the handrails are flawed.  The horizontal rails are spaced far apart, allowing motorists to become entangled, and the rails are only three feet above the road, at head level.  However, handrail design may not be solely to blame for the grisly crashes. Many of the drivers killed were speeding or not wearing seatbelts.

For more information on this story, see the Boston Globe.   

Continue reading "Big Dig Handrails Under Scrutiny After Massachusetts Drivers' Deaths" »

Bookmark and Share
March 10, 2010

Massachusetts Court Requires Medical Malpractice Tribunal in Third Party Claims

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that non-patient claims for personal injury resulting from medical malpractice must first be presented to the Massachusetts medical malpractice tribunal.  The tribunal's job is to review medical malpractice personal injury claims and decide whether there was actual medical malpractice involved or if the injury was merely an unfortunate medical result.

The decision concerned a hospital worker who was killed when a heavily medicated woman lost control of her car and drove it into an entrance to the Brockton Hospital where the victim worked.  The victim's wife sued the doctors for her husband's wrongful death, alleging they had failed to warn the woman that it was dangerous to drive while on her medications.

Ordinarily, medical negligence cases may only be brought by a patient against his or her medical provider. However, third parties may bring claims against a provider if the provider failed to warn the patient of the effects of medication, and the patient then injured the third party. The exception is a narrow one.

The case clarifies pre-trial procedures in such third party cases, as it was unclear whether or not an injured non-patient was required to bring their medical malpractice claim before the tribunal.  However, with today's Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling, it is now clear that any person looking to bring a claim for personal injury resulting from medical malpractice must first present their claim to the medical malpractice tribunal, whether or not they were the patient.

The case was Vasa v. Compass Medical, P.C., SJC-10457, March 2, 2010.

Continue reading "Massachusetts Court Requires Medical Malpractice Tribunal in Third Party Claims" »

Bookmark and Share
February 4, 2010

Toyota's Headaches Continue--Massachusetts Prius Owners Should Be Aware of Defective Brakes

Toyota faced another round of bad news this week with the announcement today of a probe by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) into braking problems in the popular Prius hybrid model. NHTSA has received at least 124 complaints about momentary braking problems in the defective vehicles. As least four car crashes have been reported. The problems are apparently associated with speed bumps, potholes, and icy roads--three things Massachusetts drivers see plenty of. The investigation concerns the 2010 Prius model year.

The Prius investigation is the third in a string of product defect recalls which are tarnishing Toyota's reputation for safety and reliability. On top of that, it seems that Toyota has been less than forthright about the problems in its cars. According to CNN (February 4, 1010), "Toyota has known about brake problems in its popular Prius cars for some time, going so far as to fix it in new production vehicles, but has kept Prius drivers in the dark about the problem until the Japanese government called for an investigation."  And the sticking gas pedal was first blamed on floor mats, and then later extended to the mechanics of the pedal itself. The Federal government has now demanded that Toyota demonstrate that the problem isn't more serious, and that it does not include other parts of the throttle control systems. Defects relating to the gas pedals have been linked to several wrongful deaths.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Roy LaHood set off a brief panic on February 3rd when he said owners of the defective Toyotas should "stop driving them."  He later clarified his statement, saying instead that owners should have them repaired as quickly as possible.

NHTSA itself has been criticized for its slow response to consumer complaints about Toyota acceleration problems, some of which date back to 2003. According to Joan Claybrook, a former head of NHTSA, several investigations were opened, then closed based upon information provided by Toyota. According to NPR, she said, "I think as a result, some people have been killed and injured that wouldn't have otherwise." (NPR, Feb 4, 2010.) 

Consumer Alert

This week Toyota finally began shipping replacement parts to dealers for the gas pedal recall. Checks with some dealers in Massachusetts revealed that free rental vehicles are available. If the dealer does not have the part, it should still provide you with a free car should you choose to leave it at the dealer for repair. Many Massachusetts consumers are rightfully fearful that their car could be involved in a motor vehicle accident.

The same courtesy should apply to the defective Prius models, and consumers should feel free to demand that the dealer provide them with a safe, alternative vehicle until their cars are fixed.

Affected Vehicles 

Models affected by the recall include:

  • 2009-2010 RAV4

  • 2009-2010 Corolla

  • 2007-2010 Camry

  • 2009-2010 Matrix

  • 2005-2010 Avalon

  • 2010 Highlander

  • 2007-2010 Tundra

  • 2008-2010 Sequoia

Please see our earlier blog on Toyota recalls for additional safety information.

More Information

Much additional information on the Toyota recall is available from the NHTSA website, www.nhtsa.gov.

Answers to Questions About Toyota Repair Plans, NY Times, Feb 1, 2010

US Launches Probe of Prius Brakes, Reuters, Feb 4, 2010

Continue reading "Toyota's Headaches Continue--Massachusetts Prius Owners Should Be Aware of Defective Brakes" »

Bookmark and Share
January 27, 2010

New Law Against Texting Intended to Reduce Distracted Driving and Truck Accidents--Rule Should Improve Safety for Massachusetts Drivers

The Federal Government is taking a firm stand against the dangers caused by texting drivers. U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced Tuesday that, effective immediately, commercial bus and truck drivers are prohibited from texting while driving. Texting truck and bus drivers face civil or criminal penalties of up to $2,750. 

The goal of the new law is to reduce truck accidents and motor vehicle accidents caused by distracted driving.  According to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, drivers take their eyes off the road for an average of 4.6 seconds out of every six seconds while texting.  This means drivers who text are more than 20 times more likely to get in an accident than nondistracted drivers.

This is not the first move that the government has made to reduce the dangers of texting drivers.  Nineteen states have passed laws banning texting while driving.  President Obama has also signed an executive order requiring federal employees not to text while driving government-owned vehicles or with government-owned equipment. 

The attention on texting comes after several high profile accidents caused by texting motor vehicle operators.  In September 2008, a California commuter train engineer missed a stop signal while trading text messages with a friend, leading to a train accident resulting in the wrongful death of 25 people.  In May 2009, 62 people suffered personal injury after a Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority trolley driver collided with another trolley while texting.

For more information about the dangers of distracted driving, see the Transportation Department's website www.distraction.gov.

Continue reading "New Law Against Texting Intended to Reduce Distracted Driving and Truck Accidents--Rule Should Improve Safety for Massachusetts Drivers" »

Bookmark and Share
January 27, 2010

Huge Toyota Recall Affects Thousands of Massachusetts Drivers--Defective Gas Pedals May Cause Runaway Acceleration

Toyota has issued another recall affecting millions of its popular vehicles due to acceleration problems caused by sticking gas pedals which are known to have caused serious personal injury and several deaths. In addition, Toyota has halted sales and will halt production of several product lines until it designs a fix for the product defect. This recall seriously affects Toyota's reputation for safety and reliability. It also affects tens of thousands of Massachusetts drivers who own the defective Toyotas. It also affects others on the highway who may be struck by a runaway vehicle.

Toyota announced the voluntary recall last Thursday, which includes about 2.3 million vehicles, "to correct sticking accelerator pedals on specific Toyota Division models."  The sticking pedals may fail to return, or return slowly, to the idle position, causing the cars to accelerate or maintain a high speed unexpectedly.

The recall comes after a recall on floor mats in September 2009 affecting 3.8 million vehicles. That recall was found to be insufficient to solve the accelerator problems. Investigators realized the product defect included more than just the floor mats after a family of four suffered wrongful deaths when their Avalon crashed into a lake. The floor mats were discovered in the trunk of that car.

In November 2009, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) called the removal of the offending floor mats an interim measure only, and said, "This remedy does not correct the underlying defect in the vehicles involving the potential for entrapment of the accelerator by floor mats, which is related to accelerator and floor pan design."

Unfortunately, Toyota has not yet proposed a plan to fix its millions of defective vehicles.

Massachusetts consumers who experience gas pedal problems are advised to apply firm pressure to the brake, and to pull off the road as soon as that can be done safely. The car should not be driven. In an emergency, the car can be put into neutral or the key turned to off. Push-button start controls can be turned off if the button is depressed for several seconds.

Models affected by the recall include:

  • 2009-2010 RAV4

  • 2009-2010 Corolla

  • 2007-2010 Camry

  • 2009-2010 Matrix

  • 2005-2010 Avalon

  • 2010 Highlander

  • 2007-2010 Tundra

  • 2008-2010 Sequoia.

Toyota customers affected by this recall should call the Toyota "Customer Experience Center" at 1-800-331-4331 with questions or concerns.

 

Continue reading "Huge Toyota Recall Affects Thousands of Massachusetts Drivers--Defective Gas Pedals May Cause Runaway Acceleration" »

Bookmark and Share